Hep C Discussion Forum

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!
Post Info TOPIC: Biopsy vs. Fibrosure


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2330
Date:
RE: Biopsy vs. Fibrosure
Permalink  
 


Hi pmrad5,

Non-invasive tests such as Fibroscan are good for detecting either no fibrosis or extensive fibrosis, but not very good for the grade and stage in between. I've posted a link to some info below.

http://www.hcvadvocate.org/hepatitis/factsheets_pdf/non-invasive_markers.pdf

Liver biopsies carry certain risks, such as internal bleeding, although these are rare. However, they can provide a more accurate picture of the degree of liver damage. Some info below.

http://www.hcvadvocate.org/hepatitis/factsheets_pdf/Biopsy.pdf

Hope this helps and it would be a good idea to discuss these options with your doctor.

Love Steff xx



__________________
Geno 3a. 24 wks tx 20/10/05 - 06/04/06. Achieved SVR.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1020
Date:
Permalink  
 

The fibroscan procedure? Beats the biopsy, for sure.



__________________

Remember.......
Pillage before you burn.
PJ


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 249
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have not heard of it either, though I did hear that they were supposed to be coming up with a less invasive way of "seeing" the liver. I'd certainly opt for the Fibrosure if given a choice.

__________________

Diagnosed in 2006. Probably infected in the late 70s or early 80s. Genotype 1B. Starting TX on 5/5/11 with the SOC and Teleprevir. 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 288
Date:
Permalink  
 

I was not offered anything but a biopsy to check for scarring on the liver.

Have not heard of Fibrosure.

Wish I could be more help.

Ron



__________________

Genotype 1a Diagnosed in 1991. Started tx April 27 2011 for 48 wks. VL before tx  1.6 - 4.6 million. RVR-week 4, UND-week 8 

Vitamin D3 suppliments can increase chances of reaching SVR. See Nutrition section for links.



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 20
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hello,

 I'm going to see doc about starting tx. Is there a big difference (results wise) between

these two procedures?

Prob. infected 89-90 geno 1 vl=2.7 mil

pmrad5



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Legal Disclaimer:

THIS FORUM, IT'S OWNERS, ADMINISTRATORS, MODERATORS AND MEMBERS DO NOT AT ANY TIME GIVE MEDICAL ADVICE AND IN ALL CASES REFER ANYONE HERE TO SEEK APPROPRIATE MEDICAL ADVICE FROM THEIR DOCTOR.