Hep C Discussion Forum

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!
Post Info TOPIC: Imaging followup after SVR


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 177
Date:
RE: Imaging followup after SVR
Permalink  
 


Hi Malcom,

For info :

In France, cirrhotic have a 3 monthly ultrasound and a yearly RMI. I beleive if it was not important, they would not do it.

 

Do



__________________

Geno 1b. VL 17. M. AbbVie Turquoise II. UND EOT 4. 8. 12. SVR.

"Our task must be to free ourselves by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature and its beauty."Albert Einstein

 

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3398
Date:
Permalink  
 

There is no doubt that SVR decreases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), with some studies suggesting by up to a factor of 10.  However, most Hepatologists agree that long-term followup is required, to detect early and potentially curable HCC.  AFP measurement is not specific enough so some form of liver imaging is required. For cirrhotics with SVR, the traditional followup was to have an AFP and a liver ultrasound every 6 months. Many think that F3 and F3-4 patients should also be included.

The recent Radiology journals are full of papers on early HCC detection. This is due to the rapid increase of HCC, mostly due to HCV patients. This increase is expected to continue for the next few years. Ultrasound is good for detecting suspicious lesions as small as 10 mms, but is non-specific. There are also limitations due to patient habitus and operator skills.  The general consensus is that MRI is superior to Ultrasound, CT, and Nuclear Medicine.  In last month's Australian Journal of Radiology, MRI sequences were explained using the latest liver-specific contrast agents, that could reliably recognise HCC's of 5mms in diameter, even in a cirrhotic liver. The vascular pattern is very important.  Up until now, there was great difficulty differentiating between a regenerating nodule (in cirrhotics) and a small HCC. This is very important in Rx options. The doubling (of size) time for an HCC is between 6 and 12 months. Surgical resection is the Rx of choice for such small lesions, and can result in a >70% 5 year survival.  

This is all very well and good in theory, but in practice, a 6 monthly MRI will be dismissed as being too expensive. In my case, I will be having a 6 monthly Ultrasound, and a yearly MRI.  I am difficult to ultrasound, having a high R diaphragm and prominent lower ribs. I have a 14 mm haemangioma in segment 2 of the L. liver lobe, which is impossible to see on ultrasound, but lights up like a Christmas tree on MRI ( and CT).  I urge all SVR patients who are F3 or worse, to ask their Hepatologist whether a yearly MRI is a good option, rather than just relying on 6 monthly Ultrasounds. Cost will be a factor ( as always).   Cheers.



__________________

Geno 1b, IL28B CT,  x3 prior relapser,  ex-cirrhotic, 75 yo, did 48 weeks with Victrelis/Peg./Riba.  VL 1.28m at start, UNDET. at 8 ,12 ,16 ,24 ,30  and 48 weeks.  EOT 15 Feb 2013 , UNDET. at EOT + 28 weeks. SVR!  Still Undet. at EOT +5 years

Malcolm

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Legal Disclaimer:

THIS FORUM, IT'S OWNERS, ADMINISTRATORS, MODERATORS AND MEMBERS DO NOT AT ANY TIME GIVE MEDICAL ADVICE AND IN ALL CASES REFER ANYONE HERE TO SEEK APPROPRIATE MEDICAL ADVICE FROM THEIR DOCTOR.