Hep C Discussion Forum

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!
Post Info TOPIC: Week 4 only 1/2 log drop


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3398
Date:
RE: Week 4 only 1/2 log drop
Permalink  
 


Hi Jack,

Are you sure that's correct? Whenever there is an E in the result, that's Scientific Notation which is peculiar to some Canadian labs.

When the VL is expressed in S.N., it will be e.g. 3.23E + 2 i.u./ml. The number following the + must be a whole number. The example I gave is equal to 323 i.u./ml.

VL expressed in Log. units is different.



__________________

Geno 1b, IL28B CT,  x3 prior relapser,  ex-cirrhotic, 75 yo, did 48 weeks with Victrelis/Peg./Riba.  VL 1.28m at start, UNDET. at 8 ,12 ,16 ,24 ,30  and 48 weeks.  EOT 15 Feb 2013 , UNDET. at EOT + 28 weeks. SVR!  Still Undet. at EOT +5 years

Malcolm



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 118
Date:
Permalink  
 

mallani wrote:

Hi Jack,

Are you sure that's correct? Whenever there is an E in the result, that's Scientific Notation which is peculiar to some Canadian labs.

When the VL is expressed in S.N., it will be e.g. 3.23E + 2 i.u./ml. The number following the + must be a whole number. The example I gave is equal to 323 i.u./ml.

VL expressed in Log. units is different.


 Offical lab results  states the results asHepatitis C Virus RNA {Quantitative RT-PCR ]      3.23E+(2.51) IU/mL.   Using the Roche Diagnostic Taqman Real Time HCV qualititative assay has  a lower limit of detection of 15 IU/mL and a linear range of 43-G 9E& IU/ml.  The log drop was indicated by a arrow down 3.64 * an is written by hand, this is vebatim so what does this all mean to me? good /bad?



-- Edited by TeddyTrout on Saturday 26th of January 2013 08:56:20 AM

__________________

Don't sweat the small stuff, it will only give you hair loss.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 118
Date:
Permalink  
 

mallani wrote:

Hi Jack,

Your 8 week VL is 2.51 log, which is equivalent to 320 i.u./ml. That's a good drop. Now you need to be below 100 i.u./ml at week 12. It's confusing using log units, and I wish Labs could agree to only use i.u./ml.  Here's another link for you.  Good luck.

 

http://www.natap.org/2011/HCV/stopping.htm


 I guess The Canadian results are quoted diffrent as the Offical lab results  states the results as 3.23E+(2.51) IU/mL 3.64, most likly a combined report from baseline. Using the Roche Diagnostic Taqman Real Time HCV qualititative assay has  a lower limit of detection of 15 IU/mL and a linear range of 43-G 9E& IU/ml. {what ever that means LOL} My HGB has dropped to 103 so there having me do 1 less Riba pill per day for the next little while. 



__________________

Don't sweat the small stuff, it will only give you hair loss.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3398
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hi Jack,

Your 8 week VL is 2.51 log, which is equivalent to 320 i.u./ml. That's a good drop. Now you need to be below 100 i.u./ml at week 12. It's confusing using log units, and I wish Labs could agree to only use i.u./ml.  Here's another link for you.  Good luck.

 

http://www.natap.org/2011/HCV/stopping.htm



__________________

Geno 1b, IL28B CT,  x3 prior relapser,  ex-cirrhotic, 75 yo, did 48 weeks with Victrelis/Peg./Riba.  VL 1.28m at start, UNDET. at 8 ,12 ,16 ,24 ,30  and 48 weeks.  EOT 15 Feb 2013 , UNDET. at EOT + 28 weeks. SVR!  Still Undet. at EOT +5 years

Malcolm



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 118
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hi all sorry for not dropping by and saying hi and being supportive for all of you but I'ts been a rough time this 3 time around. I have just got my week 8 PCR and am not very encuraged buy the results but then I don't really know much about the information I now have and maybe you can weigh in and let me know. VL at the start was 6.15 and a week 4 leadin it dropped 1/2 log to 5.75 and at week 8 pcr it has rdropped tro 2.51 or a 3.64 log drop from base line.



__________________

Don't sweat the small stuff, it will only give you hair loss.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3398
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hi Jack, not a great result. The link gives the SVR chances based on the leadin. Strange things can happen.

 

http://www.victrelis.com/boceprevir/victrelis/hcp/dosing/lead-in-phase.jsp



__________________

Geno 1b, IL28B CT,  x3 prior relapser,  ex-cirrhotic, 75 yo, did 48 weeks with Victrelis/Peg./Riba.  VL 1.28m at start, UNDET. at 8 ,12 ,16 ,24 ,30  and 48 weeks.  EOT 15 Feb 2013 , UNDET. at EOT + 28 weeks. SVR!  Still Undet. at EOT +5 years

Malcolm



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Date:
Permalink  
 

 

The influence of lead-in period for the SVR is contradictory in different studies. For example, the following report forecasts SVR basing 8 weeks response:

 

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/AntiviralDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM252341.pdf     page 9:

 

Table 6. SVR by Virologic Response on Treatment (P05216) Cohorts 1 and 2 Combined

Virologic Response

Arm 2 (RGT)

SVR

n/N (%)

Arm 3 Boc/PR48

SVR

n/N (%)

Treatment Difference

Arm 2-Arm 3

[95% CI two sided]

Overall

233/368 (63.3)

242/366 (66.1)

2.8 [-9.8, 4.1]

*Early Responders

156/161 (96.9)

155/161 (96.3)

0.6 [-3.8, 5.2]

#Late Responders

45/68 (66)

55/73 (75)

-9.2 [-24.4, 6.3]

 

*Early Responders: Undetectable HCV RNA treatment Week 8 through 24 (In RGT arm, early responders received BOC/PR through Week treatment Week 28).

#Late Responders: Detectable HCV RNA Week 8, but undetectable by Week 24 (In RGT arm, late responders received 28 weeks BOC/PR, followed by 20 weeks of PR for total of 48 weeks. Subjects were discontinued for futility at Week 24 in all treatment arms if HCV RNA was detectable.

I discussed the issue with the two experienced hepatologists and both are guided by an 8 week response (after 4 weeks Victrelis). Poor response in lead-in period only increases the duration of therapy (until 36 or 48 weeks), but less important for final SVR with Victrelis.



-- Edited by Uval951 on Sunday 23rd of December 2012 01:15:13 PM

__________________

 

Gen. 1b. 1st Tx in 2003 Rib/Peg. Biopsy F3-F4; 2nd Tx started 2/28/12, Pegasys+RibaPak+Victrelis for 48 weeks. VL: 260,000 (starting), 125,600 (4 weeks), UND-weeks 6-45.EOT 1/7/13 after 45 full weeks. Post Tx 4,12,24 weeks -UND  SVR!



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink  
 

Also Jack,

I didn't know fish ride bicycles!! hahaha!

Funny avatar.

:)

 



__________________

Geno 1a, second time around, stable viral load since 1973, timing is right for new therapy



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink  
 

It took me until week 6 to be undetected. Give it alittle time, it will work.

You might have a tough immune system fighting off the initial start of treatment. That happened to me back in 1980 the first time around for me.

Best of luck!!

:)

 



__________________

Geno 1a, second time around, stable viral load since 1973, timing is right for new therapy



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Date:
Permalink  
 

Jack, don't worry yet. Wife's response was even worse after 4 weeks lead-in period. But Victrelis changes the results a lot and after 6th week (2 weeks of Victrelis only) she got UND.

I suggest to make PCR test after 6 weeks ( don't wait for standard 8 weeks) for better Tx duration schedule.



__________________

 

Gen. 1b. 1st Tx in 2003 Rib/Peg. Biopsy F3-F4; 2nd Tx started 2/28/12, Pegasys+RibaPak+Victrelis for 48 weeks. VL: 260,000 (starting), 125,600 (4 weeks), UND-weeks 6-45.EOT 1/7/13 after 45 full weeks. Post Tx 4,12,24 weeks -UND  SVR!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1077
Date:
Permalink  
 

There are a lot of smart people on this forum
What is your doctors opinion?

__________________

JoAnne

Genotype 1a, Triple therapy w/Invicek started May 19, 2012

DET 4 wk. UND 2,6,12,24 48 treatment. Achieved SVR 2013!



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 118
Date:
Permalink  
 

Just got the news about my first PCR into the treatment. After 4 weeks of Interferon and riba I only had a 1/2 log drop. I'm into my 2 week of Victrelis Boceprvir and will have my second PCR in January, It's not looking good. I was a slow responder last time and had break through in a 72 week trial the last try in 05 but I had 2 log drops right up to week 24 was still positive but not able to do a count. I'm thinking I just might quit and wait and see if anything eles comes up. I'm a stage 3/2 back in 07.



__________________

Don't sweat the small stuff, it will only give you hair loss.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Legal Disclaimer:

THIS FORUM, IT'S OWNERS, ADMINISTRATORS, MODERATORS AND MEMBERS DO NOT AT ANY TIME GIVE MEDICAL ADVICE AND IN ALL CASES REFER ANYONE HERE TO SEEK APPROPRIATE MEDICAL ADVICE FROM THEIR DOCTOR.